Although I hope you agree that this accusation is absurd on the face of it, my proofs are extensive, complex, and involve a lot of stuff (documents, emails, etc)…. At this writing I’m under deadline pressure to get this site ready for the pre-release of my book, so this section is incomplete.

It appears Fowlie, in his fraudulent claims and accepting money from me ($10,000) has perpetrated a fraud of his own. Should I get crankier than I already am about his treachery, I may file a criminal complaint, which would result in his returning to the clink to serve out the remainder of the 30 year Rico Act sentence he’s now on parole from. Yes, a warning to the shitball motherfucker.

Having said that: I will now back up my assertion that Fowlie told Lisa (during my exile on the Caribbean island) that I assumed I was in danger from the Moras; and, further, I will prove that Fowlie told Lisa (and hence the Moras) where I could be found.

Date:Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:57:29 -0800 (PST) From: "Lisa XXXXX" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject:Heard from Danny and other things To:"Allan Weisbecker" CC:"Lic. Juan Francisco Mora O"

Hello Allan,

I heard from Danny. Apparently you guys had a falling out. He thinks you (we) made hundreds of thousands of dollars in land sales.

I told him we each made about $70k to $80k from the land sales, excluding the houses (which we built and paid for and sold). That land was ours, legally, according to the Registro, and same for when Joaquim owned it too. Legally and morally.You have no reason to be afraid in Pavones or be afraid of me.

I would never hurt you or your property or seek to have someone else do that on my behalf, never. NEVER. I harbor no violence towards you nor hatred. Some residual anger, ok, but that’s pretty limited.

Whoever is telling you that Esteban and I were lovers or that he or I are a danger to you is pulling a Captain Ron on you. That is all nonsense. Untrue. Usually there is no point in trying to dissuade you from things you want to believe, but you should know I am no threat to you, especially to your safety, and I am sure you are the last thing on Esteban Mora’s mind.

I do have rights here in Costa Rica, even though I am not a resident. If you continue to have people harass me in Pavones, or publish a book that slanders me, you’ll find my lawyer is not as nice as Juan Francisco. Stop worrying about me as any danger to you. Enjoy Tobago. Heck, maybe enjoy life. If you want to reply, you know who to go through.

Lisa

The above email from February 28 (2006) is significant in that Lisa says she “heard from Danny” and adds that Danny and I had “a falling out.” A beaut of a lie by omission here, since we know from Jean that Lisa caused the falling out via her emailing Fowlie, which started no later than Valentine’s Day, two weeks before this one. (Lisa’s accusation that I’d had people in Pavones “harass” her is ridiculous.

And the slander-lawsuit threat (she meant libel) is taken care of here on this site.) (Lisa’s reference to “pulling a Captain Ron” refers to Ron, the ex-merc who gaslit Lisa and me into thinking Logan hired a hit man to kill me. Peripherally, this backs up my version of that fiasco. (More to come.) What Lisa didn’t know when she said this, however, is that Fowlie himself “pulled [the] Captain Ron” – it’s obvious Fowlie hadn’t informed Lisa of how the Esteban revelation came about; now that he and Lisa were tight, he was no doubt embarrassed about blowing the whistle on her.

Point being: Ron had a motive in gaslighting me (money). Neither Fowlie nor Jean had any motive to lie (about Lisa and Esteban); in fact, quite the reverse, especially in Jean’s case. Jean’s revelations could cause her problems at Pavones – if anything, she had motive not to tell me. So the “pulling a Captain Ron” comment is absurd.)

Fowlie’s volley of bizarre accusations preceded Lisa’s above email by a matter of days: further evidence that Lisa caused his lunatic turnaround. Re-quoting a Fowlie email from the previous day, February 27:

You know Lisa is a free spirit and not really ready to settle down with one man – unless he is perfect in her eyes. You weren’t.

(I’ll eventually reproduce all of Fowlie’s and my correspondences in their totality.) So Lisa’s gaslighting of Fowlie about our relationship was included in their pen-pal stuff since Valentine’s Day or before. If you’re thinking that maybe Lisa already knew where I was, from who-knows-what source, here’s a couple emails from my caretaker, Marcos (the first one is only to give an approximate date of the second one):

De: acwdownsouth@yahoo.com Enviado: Jue 09/02/2006 05:04:41 AM Asunto: Re: personal marcos, como dije, regreso en el 18 o 19 de enero con el comprador. hay que areglar perfecta todo en la casa y el lote! intenta de hablar con juan francisco martes por telefono. allan — Marcos Arturo Salazar Godinez wrote ——————————— Buenos días La presente,es para saludarle ,a la vez esperando goce de un buen estado de salud. Aqui en la casa todo marcha de manera normal,con la novedad de que Elisa esta como desesperada por saber cuando regresa usted,incluso ha querido utilizar ha Maria Luiza para obtener informacion diciendole que ella se a comunicado con usted y que usted estaba muy enfermo y hospitalizado ,que usted estuvo en Europa y que ahora estaba en Nueva York ,quiza esto con la intencion que yo le diga que no es cierto por que yo me he comunicado con usted y que usted esta en x lugar .Sin embargo siempre le he dicho a doña Luiza que no se nada de usted que siempre que llamo a su telefono nunca contesta y que por lo tanto ni siquiera se su estado de salud mucho menos saber donde se encuentra.Por lo tanto continue tranquilo las demas cosas estan en orden los carros estan lavados y limpios . Attentamente, su servidor. Marcos XXXXX.

In the above, Marcos says that Lisa has been desperate to find out when I’m returning to Pavones and where I’ve been, even telling outrageous lies (of why she needs to know) like I’m in the hospital and very sick and maybe even in Europe. This Marcos email was likely from early January, before I returned to sell my house. (It’s not dated but is attached to one that is dated February 2.)

But the point being: Lisa didn’t know where I’d been (Tobago) since October, three months previously. Now suddenly, on February 28, she does know, right after her volleys of emails with Fowlie, who was the only person who did know where I was.

A Meanwhile: Lisa wanted me to know that Fowlie betrayed me, which is why she went out of her way to show me that she now knew where I was (right after saying she “heard from Danny”).

Right. A blurt related to her domination game. Based on the all of the above is there any doubt that Fowlie told Lisa that I was worried about violence from Esteban Mora (or the Moras as a family) because of the Dalton expose and that Fowlie told Lisa where I was? Virtually no doubt at all, I think. And this is a guy who hired an armed bodyguard for a brief visit to Pavones and who affirmed to me many times how dangerous Pavones is and who often and profusely thanked me for putting my ass on the line for him there. A shitball motherfucker of the first magnitude.

As I say, I will be archiving on this site all my correspondences with Fowlie, plus Lisa, to make this point, plus others, even more inarguable.

Much of my proofs that Fowlie’s accusations are false are contained in the section on Brian Neumann’s libelous review of In Search of Captain Zero. Inclued in this link is the document Fowlie gave me absolving me from fraud charges, and, more importantly, other documents that prove I didn’t lie about anything, let alone perpetrate fraud. Here’s the link, although you may have already seen it in the Relentless section:

http://cygawa.aweisbecker.com/contents/relentless-3/

I wasn’t sure where to put the following, but since it relates to charges of land fraud against me, here it is:

LISA STEALS MONEY FROM ME

This first example is more like extortion. Here’s a letter I sent to Lisa. It went unanswered.

Lisa,

Some loose ends, legal and financial. I’ll number them. 

1. In a recent email you said you were “not amused” that I’d told your “friend” Brian that you were extorting money from me. Since in the same email you threatened a lawsuit, I’ll first deal with the extortion observation I made. Then, below that, I’ll deal with who might sue whom. 

When you said you wanted to build Casa Tigre, the main reason you gave was to “learn” about home building down south, so you could someday go into that business. Fine. Yes, since you had zero experience in home building, you had a lot to learn.

As you’ll recall (unless you choose to rewrite history), there was nothing said about you getting acontractor’s commission. You wanted to learn. And you did, making plenty of costly mistakes in the process. (Having to start over is just one example. That I was involved in some of these mistakes is irrelevant since you knew that I had no desire to “learn” more about home building. As I told you, you were in charge.)

Plus, you had to hire more experienced people to advise you, help you “learn,” your “friend” Kim being one example (although you continually denigrated him

for his screw ups). I suspect you never hired your “friend” Barry because he’s “just another dumb gringo” and “a drunk.” But I digress.

Okay. You’d learn. It would cost us (me) money but okay. “Whatever you want, dear,” was what I said. Go learn. 

Then a year and a half later, as we go to sell the house you learned so much in taking all that time to build (so you’d have a future as a contractor), you suddenly demand a 20% contractor’s fee. Again, this was not part of our agreement, and again, you were not, still are not, qualified to be a contractor.

When I brought this up — that this was not part of our agreement and you were not, are not, a qualified contractor — you told our lawyer that if I didn’t agree to your new demand, you’d “kill the deal (with Linda H)” and “move into Casa Tigre.” Remember telling our lawyer Juan Francisco that? He does, since these would be illegal acts – illegal according to our partnership agreement and illegal according to the option Linda paid for. 

The end result: You would be a squatter on property I own 50% of.

If that isn’t extortion, please explain how. I’ll leave a space below for your answer.

     

2. Since I acceded to your new demand, your extortion and paid you your contractor’s fee (you knew I wouldn’t return to Costa Rica to defend myself), I have a new demand. If you can make new demands so can I. At Montauk, during the same conversation in which I told you not to stay at my house when you returned to Pavones (in early September) we settled our finances. (And of course you did stay at my house, lying to everyone. I’d be glad to forward to you the email I sent you reiterating that you should not stay at my house. Plus the one I sent to your “friend” Kim, saying the same thing. Kim of course lied about the email and lied about our phone conversations on the same subject, presumably because he’s your “friend.”)  

At Montauk, you yourself came up with the figure of $3,000 that you owed me. Remember? And what did I say? I said “Forget it, call it a wash.” (You said this:

“Thank you” and repeated your thanks in an email.) I did this as a gesture… No, it wasn’t a gesture, it was just dumb and I wanted you quickly out of my life. I should have seen your extortion coming. Anyway, I now want the $3,000 you owe me. I’ll leave a space below for you to explain why you’re not going to give it to me, should that be your response.

3. Another new demand I have: I put a financial deal in your lap that made you six figures in pure profit in two years, more than tripling your investment. I want a finder’s fee for doing that. And unlike your “contractor’s fee,” I actually deserve this. Why? You were (and still are) an absolute newcomer to Costa Rica and Pavones, whereas I had been there for years, and invested time and my life familiarizing myself with the ins and outs of the place, and getting the respect of the people there. This is how the deal I put in your lap came about. Remember? 

I’m going to be extra reasonable here and only demand $5,000 as a finder’s fee, about 2 and a half percent of your profit. That’s nothing.

If you’re going to say anything about how much you contributed to our partnership or how I made more because of you: The reason I put this deal in your lap was because of our personal relationship. Had I known about all the deceit at the start of our relationship (your promiscuity with your ex-boyfriend and your “one night stand” and lying to cover up this behavior) I would never have gotten involved with you in a land deal. I would have bought the land on my own and made much more profit. 

I’ll leave a space below for you to explain why you’re not going to give me my finder’s fee, should that be your response.

So that’s $8,000 I have coming. Please cc your response to our lawyer.

_____________

As I say, this letter went unanswered, for obvious reasons.

OUTRIGHT THEFT

Here’s a passage cut in the edit:

What about other aspects of life? Money, say? Can Lisa be trusted in a money deal? Is she a sociopath with that?           

Maybe, maybe not. Depends on whether getting uncommitted dick and not getting caught at it is somehow involved.            

I don’t understand. A person is either…           

What? A sociopath or not? I told you that that theory is witch doctor bullshit. It’s voodoo shit.           

But you said a sociopath has a hole where the soul would normally be. What does that mean? That sounds like voodoo shit.           

Good point. Never mind about that, for now.            

 So a person can be a sociopath in one area of life and not another?There are plenty of people out there who would do whatever is necessary to steal your money – I’m talking no limits – then come home and be in guilt-racked agony because they forgot to feed the goldfish. Witch doctors cannot explain this since according to their theory you either have a conscience or do not, no in-between. Which is ridiculous. (Your average used car salesman will do as an example here, let alone shitball motherfuckers like George W. Bush and his henchmen, who cause incalculable horror and “have no conscience” about it.) No amount of psychobabble can get witch doctors off the hook of this obvious truth.  

I’ll give you an example of sociopathic behavior with money, as in stealing it, on Lisa’s part that is really related to getting uncommitted dick and not getting caught at it. One time Lisa told me that someone had got into our locked bodega and stole half the money we had in there; about $700 that was in an envelope was gone, about $700 was still there. She theorized that it was our caretaker Roman’s crack head brothers, who were staying at Roman’s cottage. Said one of them must’ve squeezed through the six-inch ventilation space over the door, since she had the only key on her and there was no other way to get in.

Okay. Except this: the idea that anyone, let alone a Tico crack head, would steal half the money, $700, leaving behind another $700 (about 700 hours of bean field-chopping wages at Pavones), is not possible, in this world or in an even slightly better one. Plus, later, after someone (Alex, of Alex and Amy) reminded me of the absurdity of this theory, I realized that maybe someone with a tiny head could squeeze through the six-inch space over the door, but only with help since the space is high up. Once inside, though, there is no way he could get back out, since he’d be alone in there. Impossible. (Interestingly, this rush of insight occurred during a bout of after writing throes, which is evidence that the condition has an occasional up side.) So Lisa’s scenario was doubly impossible. 

Lisa herself, of course, stole the money.           

Not long after this one, I went into the bodega to get some money from the two hide-in-plain-sight cans we had in there – phony spray cans with false bottoms you unscrew. They were both missing from the box of a dozen or so real cans. I asked Lisa where she put them and she said she hadn’t touched them. Okay, but that didn’t work since no one on the planet knew about those cans and the money in them except us, so how could both cans (and no others) be gone, along with the couple grand in them? This obvious truth must have dawned on Lisa while we were searching the house for the money-stuffed cans: she suddenly found them stashed in her laundry bag.            

“I can’t explain it,” was her explanation of the cans being stashed in her laundry bag. Then she said this: “I guess I’m just ditty.” I immediately wrote this crapola down, hence the quotation marks.

But my point being: these maneuvers were not due to Lisa particularly coveting money, although, like anyone, she has an affinity for the stuff. These were further attempts to perception manage/gaslight me, to persuade me that no one could be trusted except her, that it’s us against the world. The logic being that if it’s us against the world she couldn’t possibly be hellbent to cop uncommitted dick whenever possible, as my drug and alcohol-addled mind had been theorizing. 

_______ 

On second thought: Lisa probably just wanted the money.